I'm not sure that a complain means we can't have any info about them whatsoever. Do you know for sure it was EOne who sent it?
Is it possible these were created using text written by other people? If we create our text descriptions from scratch, I don't think there would be any problem having articles about them based on our original writing.
Yes, EOne field the complaint to FANDOM, and a FANDOM staff member took down the pages for Armadylan and Firefly. I don’t think an exact page for the Wolfy Kids existed at that point (this all took place in November 2017), but there was an early developmental image of them that I referred to as the Werewolf children or something like that, and FANDOM took it down with the other media I mentioned with a strict order in the deletion summary, “DO NOT RESTORE”.
Even though an exact page for The Wolfy Kids wasn’t here at the time I am treating it as we can’t have a page for it anyway since an image directly about it was taken down per EOne’s complaint.
The text in the pages deleted were written by me, based on what I was able to find out about them and I’m almost certain they didn’t include text taken from anywhere else.
The pages themselves were taken down because of the imagery used in them, stated in the exact complaint which I requested FANDOM to send me. I’m unsure if I can put the complaint here for reference, but I’ll check to see if I can do so legally.
This has been an issue on the wiki for such a long time, and has ruined the wiki in my opinion, and I’m sorry this has continuously caused inconvenience for so many users. I could try to submit a counter-complaint, but if a response is made I may have to battle in court which I’d rather not do right now. Maybe one day I’ll take the risk, but for now we still can’t have any pages for The Wolfy Kids, Armadylan, or Firefly. Mentioning them on pages without links for them is probably about as far as it can safely go here. In due time I’ll need to review the images that have slipped past here.
I would maybe see with a special:contact if you could point out how there's a Wolfy Kids article on the Disney wiki and how it's sort of a double standard to let them have it but not us.
I believe when they say 'do not restore' it may refer to a certain aspect of the page (perhaps a particular image) and not the very idea of having a page itself.
Is it possible that stuff like https://disney.fandom.com/wiki/Armadylan was only temporarily not wanted because it was a spoiler perhaps because not many people had seen season 2? It's not like they were reporting the season 1 characters...
I don’t really think this is credible enough, despite what Google is telling you. It doesn’t list any kind of source of that date. Can you look farther and report back to me with anything else giving the same date?
I don’t intend to be skeptical of everything like I seem, but this isn’t very much of a confirmation. There needs to be more solid proof.
Sir Blaze, editor of FANDOM 09:12, February 11, 2019 (UTC)
SirBlaze I’m so sorry I tried what you told me about cropping the images and I did then somehow the black part was in there I’m so sorry SirBlaze it won’t happen again sorry please forgive me my mistake sorry
Xxwindows2019 not the administrators, he was blocked by the fandom staff because they thought he was the one who create sock puppet accounts to disrupt wiki and i see that you're trying to help Yvoire get unblock that he's innocent but I dont think thats gonna work because the fandom staff doesnt easily believe that they will think its an excuse but Im not saying its a lie